Freeze also holds a Bachelor Degree in Geosciences from Mississippi State University. Notably, she was also awarded Seals of Approval from both the AMS and the National Weather Association.įreeze has a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Communications from Brigham Young University. She was the 11th woman in the world to earn the prestigious Certified Broadcast Meteorologist accreditation from the American Meteorological Society (AMS). Throughout her television career, Freeze’s coverage has received numerous accolades, including Emmy awards for Best Weathercaster and Outstanding Host, as well as for her Surviving Severe Weather in 2007. Additionally, Freeze worked at the FOX Portland, OR affiliate KPTV-TV on the local morning news program Good Day Oregon. Prior to that, she served as a meteorologist and co-host of daily live program 10! for the NBC owned station WCAU-TV in Philadelphia as well as a meteorologist and morning show co-host for the ABC owned station KMGH-TV in Denver, CO. Previously, Freeze was the first female Chief Meteorologist in Chicago, IL while working at the local FOX owned and operated station WFLD-TV. Amy Freeze joined FOX Weather in 2021 where she currently serves as an anchor on the ad-supported streaming weather service.Ī five-time Emmy Award-winning meteorologist and television host, Freeze joins FOX Weather from WABC-TV in New York. Since 2011, she has been part of the station’s Eyewitness News Weather Team, where she also hosted several broadcast specials and the popular Eyewitness News Weekend Morning Edition.
0 Comments
Or at the very least replace the X-metal badging at the top of the ballistic case with the new logo rather than the old one. I guess if I were to be picky, I would say I wish they had included a completely overhauled aluminium X-metal case rather than the ballistic X-metal case it does come with. There really isn't a whole lot of negatives to the XS. Little added conveniences such as these contribute to the already long list of benefits the XS provides. For the wearers, you can tighten your own nose bridges (to a point). The customizers will love that you can probably interchange orbitals, nose bridges, and earstems (or so I've been told). The XS comes with replacement nosebombs for fine adjustments, but I've not seen any replacement templeshocks which may be a disappointment to some. However, it's just as comfortable as the Juliet, Penny or XX X-metal. The weight is comparable to other full-framed X-metals, so it's a bit on the heavier side. It's tighter than the other X-metals (partially because of the shortened earstems), but the fit will probably be great for most people. The orbitals are a work of art and would likely compliment most face structure and size. Similar design cues can be found on some of the Wires, but this is the first time this has been seen on an X-metal. The earstems are also a tad thinner and more sculpted than they have been in the past, and there is an ellipse logo carved out in the first third of the stem from the temple. The earstem on the XS is only a few millimetres shorter than the previous X-metals, but it's noticeable. The next thing I noticed was the earstems. Given Oakley's current love of more mainstream aesthetics, the XS styling is refreshing. Borrowing successful design elements of the classic Juliet, the XS creates a form that truly sets it far apart from Oakley's current design approach. It takes typically fashion-oriented square lenses and morphs it into something that would fit well in another X-men movie. But that's where part of the genius of the XS comes from. Square orbitals normally would not work well with X-metals due to their far out, futuristic styling cues. The most noticeable attribute of the XS is that it's the first squarish X-metal. It is with great relief that all factors that make the X-metals unique have finally been revived in the X-Squared. Starting back with the Romeo 2 however, the art and attitude aspects of the equation have dulled ever so slightly and eventually disappearing entirely with the Half-X. The release of the X-Squared marked the Return of the King for Oakley.Īs Oakley's #1 marquee line (at least to collectors), the X-metals are the only sunglasses in the entire current lineup that still truly embodies the philosophy of cohesively blending art, science, technology and Oakley attitude. Yes they could be lighter, no their weight does not bother me. All without looking ridiculous or derivative (like the XX x-metals) or without compromising fit (like Pitboss and many others that have large orbitals and terrible fit)Īll in all these are the end game for me. This is about as close to 100% coverage as you can get from any lens. Next lets touch on the orbitals themselves. The intake port is absolutely invisible to the wearer, while looking so badass from the outside. The outgrowths are invisible to the wearer. When wearing the X-metals everything about the frame just disappears. The most genius thing about the frame though, is how it just gets out of the way. Great lines and 'outgrowths' (in lack of a better word) make the frame more than just a holster to the orbitals. The earstems are incredibly slick! with the integrated "O" in the frame that wastes to dangerously thin before widening to accommodate the unobtainium. Now what makes the X-squareds BETTER THAN THE JULIETS? Earstems and overall styling, while obviously Oakley, are clearly a refinement over all other X-metals thus far. The original Romeos were heavy, Juliets are just light enough that they don't bother me. The frame is so large there that it blocks your view requiring you to move your head to see around it.Ĥth Juliets are not light, though I wouldn't call them heavy. Side to side the Juliets let a lot of light in the peripheral.ģrd the frame of the Juliet where the 'intake' port is gives you literally a blind spot on both sides. There is 0 coverage and quite a gap between my cheek and the bottom of the frame. The downward portion of the Orbital is downright appalling. Let me start by outlining the things that I don't like about the Juliets.ġst the earstems are rather dull with the exception of the hammerstems which are only on a few polished models.Ģnd while the orbitals are far from the smallest I have seen from Oakley they also leave a lot to be desired. Like everybody else, I read all the hype and purchased the Iridium on pre order. If you’re looking for something light and simple as a substitute to tube amps or other modeling amps I recommend buying one for yourself, because with this thing anything is possible. I got it all right in front of me and now every time I want to jam with waking up my son I just plug in my headphones and go to town. It sounds like a real amp, it feels (sonically) like a real amp and most importantly it is easy to use. I’ve ran a bunch of my pedals through it and it is one of the best things I could vouch for using to warm up your signal and give it some grit. I’ve been playing with this thing since the 26th of December and I am in love with it. But I sold it, because times are tough and I was in the market looking for a new amp and when Strymon released the Iridium and I heard it for what it was I was blown away. It was so good that people who owned tube amps thought that I was using an actual tube amp when I would play live. The amp that I used the most throughout my time playing shows and recording was always a Line 6 Flextone III and that amp had some great cab and amp models inside of it. 5) Learning curve: I DO NOT want to put what little time I have into the commitment of learning about tube amp maintenance. 4) Tone: Every amp has its own unique tone and lends itself to different things and as a musician who plays and incorporates multiple genres into their music, one amp is not enough. 3) Weight: A lot of tube combos and heads are really heavy and that isn't good for my bad back or my toddler who likes to pull things down (you’d be surprised how strong he is). 2) Maintenance: I don't want to have to upkeep this or accidentally kill myself via electrocution. But I also never really committed to buying one for five reasons: 1) Cost: I don't want to spend $300-$1000+ on a amp(s) and then have to drop $100-$200+ on a set of tubes for when they die. Because at the end of the day they’re an investment. I've always wanted a tube amp, but could never decide which one to invest in. As a person who for the longest time has played through solid state amps exclusively and has never been able to decide, let alone afford a tube amp this is a dream come true. I know I'm going to irk some purists with this review. Access up to 300 presets via MIDI switch.Expression pedal input for hands-free volume control.Supports loading of custom IRs over USB.Front headphone jack for direct stage monitoring.Preset switch for 2-channel amp functionality.Stereo ins and outs for versatile setup options.Class A JFET preamp for authentic tube amp response.Powerful 2-stage DSP processor for detailed amp/cab simulations.
The comparison study 5 was conducted in the same hospitals and with the same physicians as the original Canadian C-Spine Rule study. Although these findings seem to suggest that the Canadian C-Spine Rule is more accurate, there were several possible biases against the NEXUS criteria. 5 This study showed that, compared with the NEXUS criteria, the Canadian C-Spine Rule was more sensitive (99.4 versus 90.7 percent) and more specific (45 versus 37 percent) in its intended population. The Canadian C-Spine Rule 2 ( Figure 1 5 ) was prospectively validated in 8,283 Canadian patients it also was compared to the NEXUS criteria in a large clinical trial. The patient with the second missed injury did not have neck pain but had a fracture at the right lamina of C-6 that eventually required laminectomy and fusion. Of the latter two missed injuries, one was described in one report (but not in others) as an “extension teardrop” fracture the patient refused treatment and was asymptomatic at six weeks. The NEXUS criteria correctly identified 810 out of 818 patients (99.0 percent) with C-spine injury and 576 out of 578 patients (99.7 percent) with clinically significant injury. The study included a broad range of patients, the age range was one to 101 years, and intoxicated patients were included. 3 Patients who did not have C-spine radiography or who had the test for reasons other than trauma were excluded. health centers with blunt trauma who underwent C-spine radiography. 1 The largest of these prospective validation studies included 34,069 patients presenting to 21 U.S. The National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) low-risk criteria for C-spine radiography in patients with blunt trauma ( Table 1 1 ) were developed and validated over a 10-year period. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |